RadarFooty BackAccountRO

Elo Grid Mixt

The round's strongest boxes: neighbouring matches from the Elo grid and the condition that came up most often in their position. A box is green only if all its matches happen.

Round 23 Oct–26 Oct❄ order frozen 48 matches · boxes of 3

This round's Mixt pick

Each round we take the condition + box pair that came up most often in the season's earlier rounds — the current round is never used to choose. A box is “complete” only if every match in it meets the condition: if a single one does not, the box fails (2 out of 3 does not count).

2+ goalsbox 7
1 of 3 green · 2 pending

Chosen from the season's earlier rounds: 95% of this pair's boxes came up complete (n = 21). This season, same rule: 4 of 4 complete.

Model estimate: all happen

54% (≈ 1 in 1.86)

The product of the calibrated estimates for the box's matches, frozen before kick-off. How we calculate

History · seasons 2023-24 – 2025-26

62% 54 of 87 rounds complete
Mixt box62%
At random43%

95% interval: 52–72% · n = 87 rounds

Other strong boxes

The conditions that did well in the check, on the round's most lopsided matches, when the Mixt pick is on another box. Benchmark = the same number of matches taken at random from the same round.

Combined boxes: 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 matches

Here every match gets ITS OWN condition: the most likely of its conditions inside the band above. We take the matches that have such a condition, in Elo grid order, and build longer and longer boxes. A box is complete only if every match comes up on its own condition; the longer it is, the more rarely it comes up.

On every match: its most likely condition between ≈ 1 in 1.60 and ≈ 1 in 1.30 (62.5–76.92%) · round 23 Oct–26 Oct

3 matches · complete: 41% (≈ 1 in 2.46)1 of 3 green · 0 red · 2 pending
6 matches · complete: 16% (≈ 1 in 6.28)✗ can no longer come up
9 matches · complete: 6% (≈ 1 in 16.69)✗ can no longer come up
12 matches · complete: 3% (≈ 1 in 39.93)✗ can no longer come up
15 matches · complete: 1% (≈ 1 in 101)✗ can no longer come up

The check on past seasons

The check on past seasons, with the same rule: how many complete boxes the model expected (the sum of the probabilities) and how many came up. When the two are close, the share shown on a box is fair — neither inflated nor too cautious.

SizeBoxesModel expectedCame upLive (frozen rounds)
31077434.8 (40%)436 (40%)expected 0.4, 1 of 1 came up
651684.2 (16%)82 (16%)expected 0.2, 0 of 1 came up
933422.0 (7%)27 (8%)expected 0.1, 0 of 1 came up
122366.3 (3%)5 (2%)expected 0.0, 0 of 1 came up
151852.0 (1%)3 (2%)expected 0.0, 0 of 1 came up

Seasons 2024-25, 2025-26; same rule, estimates worked out without the match result.

Condition simulators

Combinations of 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 matches from the frozen round, on four conditions: 3+ goals, both teams score, 1st half: 2+ goals, both halves: 1+ goal. The matches come from the Elo grid positions where one of the conditions came up most often in earlier rounds; variant 1 puts on every match the condition with the best record, variant 2 the second, variant 3 the third. “By the model” instead takes the most likely matches and conditions by the model's calibrated estimate, frozen before the round (without “both halves”, which has no estimate). “By the model, 67–76.92%” takes on every match its most likely condition among all conditions, only if the estimate is within that band — below the threshold for conditions that are too easy. A combination is green only if every match in it comes up. It shows what happened, not what will happen.

Round 23 Oct–26 Oct · order frozen ❄

3 matchesin past seasons, all green: By the model: 41 of 96 rounds (42.7%) · By the model, 67–76.92%: 38 of 96 rounds (39.6%) · Variant 1: 18 of 97 rounds (18.6%) · Variant 2: 16 of 97 rounds (16.5%) · Variant 3: 15 of 97 rounds (15.5%)
6 matchesin past seasons, all green: By the model: 8 of 94 rounds (8.5%) · By the model, 67–76.92%: 18 of 93 rounds (19.4%) · Variant 1: 2 of 94 rounds (2.1%) · Variant 2: 3 of 94 rounds (3.2%) · Variant 3: 1 of 94 rounds (1.1%)
9 matchesin past seasons, all green: By the model: 1 of 90 rounds (1.1%) · By the model, 67–76.92%: 11 of 90 rounds (12.2%) · Variant 1: 1 of 92 rounds (1.1%) · Variant 2: 1 of 92 rounds (1.1%) · Variant 3: 0 of 92 rounds (0.0%)
12 matchesin past seasons, all green: By the model: 0 of 84 rounds (0.0%) · By the model, 67–76.92%: 2 of 82 rounds (2.4%) · Variant 1: 0 of 84 rounds (0.0%) · Variant 2: 0 of 84 rounds (0.0%) · Variant 3: 0 of 84 rounds (0.0%)
15 matchesin past seasons, all green: By the model: 0 of 78 rounds (0.0%) · By the model, 67–76.92%: 0 of 78 rounds (0.0%) · Variant 1: 0 of 78 rounds (0.0%) · Variant 2: 0 of 78 rounds (0.0%) · Variant 3: 0 of 78 rounds (0.0%)

By the model · the most likely combination by the calibrated estimate, frozen ❄ · ✗ at least one red

By the model, 67–76.92% · on every match its most likely condition within the band, among all conditions, frozen ❄ · ✗ at least one red

Variant 1 · ✗ at least one red

Ipswich Town – NottinghamPremier League · Both teams score✓ 1–1P38 · history 63.6% (63 of 99)Rayo Vallecano – ElcheLa Liga · Both teams score✗ 0–3P28 · history 62.4% (68 of 109)Cagliari – BolognaSerie A · Both halves: 1+ goal✗ 0–2P41 · history 67.0% (59 of 88)Augsburg – Union BerlinBundesliga · Both halves: 1+ goal✗ 1–1P22 · history 66.7% (76 of 114)Arsenal – EvertonPremier League · Both halves: 1+ goal✓ 2–0P2 · history 66.5% (103 of 155)Inter – FiorentinaSerie A · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP1 · history 71.3% (112 of 157)Hull City – BrentfordPremier League · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP43 · history 66.7% (58 of 87)Man United – BournemouthPremier League · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP32 · history 63.5% (66 of 104)Genoa – Venezia FCSerie A · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP26 · history 63.1% (70 of 111)Crystal Palace – NewcastlePremier League · 3+ goals◷ pendingP46 · history 62.5% (50 of 80)Angers SCO – LorientLigue 1 · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP48 · history 67.3% (35 of 52)Toulouse – TroyesLigue 1 · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP24 · history 66.1% (74 of 112)Sunderland – Leeds UnitedPremier League · 3+ goals◷ pendingP45 · history 68.2% (58 of 85)Freiburg – BayernBundesliga · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP7 · history 64.2% (95 of 148)Barça – Real MadridLa Liga · 3+ goals◷ pendingP19 · history 62.3% (76 of 122)

Variant 2 · ✗ at least one red

Ipswich Town – NottinghamPremier League · 3+ goals✗ 1–1P38 · history 59.6% (59 of 99)Rayo Vallecano – ElcheLa Liga · Both halves: 1+ goal✓ 0–3P28 · history 62.4% (68 of 109)Cagliari – BolognaSerie A · Both teams score✗ 0–2P41 · history 60.2% (53 of 88)Augsburg – Union BerlinBundesliga · Both teams score✓ 1–1P22 · history 60.5% (69 of 114)Arsenal – EvertonPremier League · 3+ goals✗ 2–0P2 · history 60.0% (93 of 155)Inter – FiorentinaSerie A · 3+ goals◷ pendingP1 · history 65.6% (103 of 157)Hull City – BrentfordPremier League · Both teams score◷ pendingP43 · history 62.1% (54 of 87)Man United – BournemouthPremier League · Both teams score◷ pendingP32 · history 61.5% (64 of 104)Genoa – Venezia FCSerie A · Both teams score◷ pendingP26 · history 61.3% (68 of 111)Crystal Palace – NewcastlePremier League · Both teams score◷ pendingP46 · history 62.5% (50 of 80)Angers SCO – LorientLigue 1 · Both teams score◷ pendingP48 · history 63.5% (33 of 52)Toulouse – TroyesLigue 1 · 3+ goals◷ pendingP24 · history 58.9% (66 of 112)Sunderland – Leeds UnitedPremier League · Both teams score◷ pendingP45 · history 65.9% (56 of 85)Freiburg – BayernBundesliga · 3+ goals◷ pendingP7 · history 57.4% (85 of 148)Barça – Real MadridLa Liga · Both teams score◷ pendingP19 · history 59.0% (72 of 122)

Variant 3 · ✗ at least one red

Ipswich Town – NottinghamPremier League · Both halves: 1+ goal✗ 1–1P38 · history 58.6% (58 of 99)Rayo Vallecano – ElcheLa Liga · 3+ goals✓ 0–3P28 · history 51.4% (56 of 109)Cagliari – BolognaSerie A · 3+ goals✗ 0–2P41 · history 53.4% (47 of 88)Augsburg – Union BerlinBundesliga · 3+ goals✗ 1–1P22 · history 56.1% (64 of 114)Arsenal – EvertonPremier League · Both teams score✗ 2–0P2 · history 50.3% (78 of 155)Inter – FiorentinaSerie A · Both teams score◷ pendingP1 · history 59.2% (93 of 157)Hull City – BrentfordPremier League · 3+ goals◷ pendingP43 · history 51.7% (45 of 87)Man United – BournemouthPremier League · 3+ goals◷ pendingP32 · history 56.7% (59 of 104)Genoa – Venezia FCSerie A · 3+ goals◷ pendingP26 · history 55.0% (61 of 111)Crystal Palace – NewcastlePremier League · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP46 · history 58.8% (47 of 80)Angers SCO – LorientLigue 1 · 3+ goals◷ pendingP48 · history 59.6% (31 of 52)Toulouse – TroyesLigue 1 · Both teams score◷ pendingP24 · history 56.2% (63 of 112)Sunderland – Leeds UnitedPremier League · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP45 · history 60.0% (51 of 85)Freiburg – BayernBundesliga · Both teams score◷ pendingP7 · history 46.6% (69 of 148)Barça – Real MadridLa Liga · Both halves: 1+ goal◷ pendingP19 · history 58.2% (71 of 122)

How the simulators did

The same rule applied to every round of past seasons, picking only with the rounds before it: how often it would have come out all green and how often it would have had at least one red. The “promised” column = what the model expected (the “model” row) or how often it would have come out if the position rates repeated exactly (variants 1–3); the model is close to what happened, the positions promise far more; in reality far fewer did, and a long combination almost never comes out whole.

MatchesVariantAll green · past seasonsAt least one redPromised (the model / the position rates)This season
3model41 of 96 rounds (42.7%)95% interval: 33.3%–52.7%55 (57.3%)29.2%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
3By the model, 67–76.92%38 of 96 rounds (39.6%)95% interval: 30.4%–49.6%58 (60.4%)44.8%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
3118 of 97 rounds (18.6%)95% interval: 12.1%–27.4%79 (81.4%)36.0%0 of 10 rounds (0.0%)
3216 of 97 rounds (16.5%)95% interval: 10.4%–25.1%81 (83.5%)25.2%2 of 10 rounds (20.0%)
3315 of 97 rounds (15.5%)95% interval: 9.6%–24.0%82 (84.5%)21.2%1 of 10 rounds (10.0%)
6model8 of 94 rounds (8.5%)95% interval: 4.4%–15.9%86 (91.5%)7.0%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
6By the model, 67–76.92%18 of 93 rounds (19.4%)95% interval: 12.6%–28.5%75 (80.6%)19.8%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
612 of 94 rounds (2.1%)95% interval: 0.6%–7.4%92 (97.9%)11.2%0 of 8 rounds (0.0%)
623 of 94 rounds (3.2%)95% interval: 1.1%–9.0%91 (96.8%)6.0%1 of 8 rounds (12.5%)
631 of 94 rounds (1.1%)95% interval: 0.2%–5.8%93 (98.9%)4.0%0 of 8 rounds (0.0%)
9model1 of 90 rounds (1.1%)95% interval: 0.2%–6.0%89 (98.9%)1.6%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
9By the model, 67–76.92%11 of 90 rounds (12.2%)95% interval: 7.0%–20.6%79 (87.8%)8.7%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
911 of 92 rounds (1.1%)95% interval: 0.2%–5.9%91 (98.9%)3.2%0 of 7 rounds (0.0%)
921 of 92 rounds (1.1%)95% interval: 0.2%–5.9%91 (98.9%)1.3%0 of 7 rounds (0.0%)
930 of 92 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.0%92 (100.0%)0.7%0 of 7 rounds (0.0%)
12model0 of 84 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.4%84 (100.0%)0.3%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
12By the model, 67–76.92%2 of 82 rounds (2.4%)95% interval: 0.7%–8.5%80 (97.6%)3.8%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
1210 of 84 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.4%84 (100.0%)0.9%0 of 7 rounds (0.0%)
1220 of 84 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.4%84 (100.0%)0.3%0 of 7 rounds (0.0%)
1230 of 84 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.4%84 (100.0%)0.1%0 of 7 rounds (0.0%)
15model0 of 78 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.7%78 (100.0%)0.1%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
15By the model, 67–76.92%0 of 78 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.7%78 (100.0%)1.6%0 of 1 round (0.0%)
1510 of 78 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.7%78 (100.0%)0.3%0 of 7 rounds (0.0%)
1520 of 78 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.7%78 (100.0%)0.1%0 of 7 rounds (0.0%)
1530 of 78 rounds (0.0%)95% interval: 0.0%–4.7%78 (100.0%)0.0%0 of 7 rounds (0.0%)

Seasons 2024-25, 2025-26, walk-forward: every round is picked only with the rounds before it.

The model against the result, round by round

For every round with estimates frozen before kick-off: what the model gave for the complete box (the product of the per-match estimates) and whether it came up. The sum of the estimates = how many complete boxes the model expected; if many more or many fewer come up, it shows here.

RoundConditionBoxModel: allResult
23 Oct–26 Oct2+ goals754%◷ pending
16 Oct–19 OctHome team scores176%✓ complete

Over finished rounds: the model expected 0.8 complete boxes; 1 of 1 came up.

What it does not show

What to know before reading a green box: the history describes past rounds, not what comes next.

← Elo grid

Updated 2026-10-25 07:20 UTC